the online meeting place for all who love our amphibians and reptiles
Home Page Live Forums Archived Forums Site Search Identify Record Donate Projects Links
Forum Home Forum Home > General > Photography
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Problem with DPI
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Problem with DPI

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
djp_phillips View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 180
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote djp_phillips Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Problem with DPI
    Posted: 20 Apr 2006 at 4:05pm
I have a Canon Powershot A95, I am about to contribute photos to a book
who asked me to make futur photos 300 dpi min. i should make the
camera set up to do so directly, but I don't know how to set it,does
anyone know?
Reptiles & Amphibians of France:
www.herpfrance.com

European Field Herping Community:
www.euroherp.com
Back to Top
Matt View Drop Down
Member
Member


Joined: 09 Feb 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 22
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Matt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Apr 2006 at 6:33am

I think the DPI setting relates to the printing of the photos at the 'other end' as it were - 300 DPI is the standard resolution for most laser printers etc. 

I have always been advised to supply the largest electronic file size possible for a picture, there is more detail in a bigger electronic file and less loss of quality of things are blown up or enlarged.  Sorting out how many DPI will be required is a job for the printer or the typesetter, not for the photographer.  I'd snap away at max resolution for the camera and leave it at that.

Regards

Matt

 

Back to Top
-LAF View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 Apr 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 317
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote -LAF Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 Apr 2006 at 5:35pm
DPI is a funny one. DPI isn't a real physical property of a digital file, rather it is a property of the output medium. For example, screen resolution is accepted to be about 72dpi while for photographic quality printing we are told we need 300dpi. And one file can do both of these.

Consider, a pictures physical size is measured in pixels. Imagine a camera creates an image that is (let's keep the math easy) 3000 pixels by 2000 pixels. Now, if we want to print this file at 300dpi we would probably choose to maximise quality by assigning a single pixel of info to each printed dot. So we would use the image at 300ppi (pixels per inch) and print at 300 dpi. If 300  pixels now represents an inch at print, this image will print out at 10inches by 6.6inches (3000 and 2000 pixels respectively, divided by 300ppi). Which isn't quite A4. If you wanted to print larger at 300dpi you would have to up-res the image, that is to increase the pixel dimensions of the image through interpolation (resize in Photoshop or similar). Unless you're shooting something massive like digital MF or a 1Ds2, most slide libraries will require that you do this when submitting a digital file to meet their filesize guidelines. In essence, all you need to know to send them the image at the required size is, as mentioned, take the image at your cameras maximum quality setting and then find out how big the printed image is going to be. Multiply the size (in inches) by 300 and you have the pixel size you'll need to print at 300dpi.

A quick note on inkjet printers, don't worry about claims of 1440dpi or even higher, you don't need images at 1440ppi to get the best out of them, they're simply quoting the total number of dots between all the print heads, so if Epsons heads can print about 360dpi, and it has four (cyan, magenta, yellow and black) then there will be 1440 DOTS per inch, but it will only represent 360 pixels as you mostly need all 4 inks to accurately represent each pixel. And in truth, 240ppi looks near as dammit as good because inkjets can guarentee making their dots land in exactly the same places for each colour.

Lee.


Edited by -LAF
Lee Fairclough
Back to Top
Deano View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 133
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Deano Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 May 2006 at 4:10pm

Try to remember that dpi and ppi are two different things. Dots per inch are the spots of ink a printer lays down (like the half tone you see in news print) and pixels per inch are the pixels that make up an electronic scanned/digital image.

I would go with the advice of use the highest resolution you can but, don't be disappointed if they reject your images. I know some pro wildlife photographers whos' agencies demand a 17 million pixel image, such as you get from the 1Ds mkII. And other agencies who are happy with half that size. These are the ones who know how to use an image.

Can I mention Andy Rouse? He once told me he did a shoot for a car dealership using the D30 (the first pro-sumer digital slr) which had 3.25 million pixels and the agency blew the image up for a billboard. Now how big do you really need a file to be.

The standard image size for publication purposes is usually  A3 dimensions (420mmx297mm) at 300ppi.

Oh and to set your camera up for max resolution - READ THE MANUAL!

Deano
Better to be lucky than good looking.
Back to Top
djp_phillips View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 180
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote djp_phillips Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2006 at 9:54am
thanks every one
Reptiles & Amphibians of France:
www.herpfrance.com

European Field Herping Community:
www.euroherp.com
Back to Top
Dasaan View Drop Down
Member
Member


Joined: 23 Aug 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 13
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dasaan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Aug 2006 at 7:49pm
Maybe a bit late but also be sure to set the "quality" to the highest available. In the case of the Canon PowerShot range this is generally SuperFine.

All you are doing is setting the compression factor of the jpeg file produced, the lower the quality the higher the compression factor and the worse the image will look at larger sizes.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.06
Copyright ©2001-2016 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.234 seconds.